[CentOS] [CentOS-announce] CESA-2012:0465 Critical CentOS 5 samba Update

[Johnny Hughes]

On 04/24/2012 05:00 PM, James A. Peltier wrote:
> Any idea about samba3x packages?  Are they vulnerable?
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> | 
> | CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2012:0465 Critical
> | 
> | Upstream details at :
> | http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0465.html
> | 
> | The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
> | syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
> | 
> | i386:
> | 50fc234754d886f8147c22ed2b034d1f7be84dd78c10a8280699265a9c542cfa
> |  libsmbclient-3.0.33-3.39.el5_8.i386.rpm
> | 62c20ba55a5213be09a2250454274f1fbf6aa854e84d78aaa1f75aec5d2a1920
> |  libsmbclient-devel-3.0.33-3.39.el5_8.i386.rpm
> | 294d346782344d32018a02ac25c9def811cbaced00ce19c0ca7c193d4f68d0c0
> |  samba-3.0.33-3.39.el5_8.i386.rpm
> | b792d801b4d57882b7c3f398d44b378446d6be48a07b12b265f07dc25564db13
> |  samba-client-3.0.33-3.39.el5_8.i386.rpm
> | 77a3666353bbc27ff71b1d4e34882459c5b440f783f21bb3c0adc3898ef501fb
> |  samba-common-3.0.33-3.39.el5_8.i386.rpm
> | 1bea83056056c3da0dc568f13655c61c6b14f56957e7180aaaa4d6d8f26f7c82
> |  samba-swat-3.0.33-3.39.el5_8.i386.rpm
> | 
> | x86_64:
> | 50fc234754d886f8147c22ed2b034d1f7be84dd78c10a8280699265a9c542cfa
> |  libsmbclient-3.0.33-3.39.el5_8.i386.rpm
> | 61b5237a09f59a445730e994517ad565fb24da1e9bf07b5e6b7b8c80ac6ca588
> |  libsmbclient-3.0.33-3.39.el5_8.x86_64.rpm
> | 62c20ba55a5213be09a2250454274f1fbf6aa854e84d78aaa1f75aec5d2a1920
> |  libsmbclient-devel-3.0.33-3.39.el5_8.i386.rpm
> | 5c973b1c9c0a986989805afe6f600a48a76d9d6175e92896065591795516a157
> |  libsmbclient-devel-3.0.33-3.39.el5_8.x86_64.rpm
> | 55ee35ca8dc332e0bea6299ce2eed90d7b9460ae312a8abf42822cd0a737c555
> |  samba-3.0.33-3.39.el5_8.x86_64.rpm
> | 70200f37cfe741d94e9bb9060f9f2128d08a90ac6b6674f97a9adb474ea3f41b
> |  samba-client-3.0.33-3.39.el5_8.x86_64.rpm
> | 77a3666353bbc27ff71b1d4e34882459c5b440f783f21bb3c0adc3898ef501fb
> |  samba-common-3.0.33-3.39.el5_8.i386.rpm
> | 16e9165d7d3f3099d45f6389a58f7ebc87642856414506728e5d8f0466e343a3
> |  samba-common-3.0.33-3.39.el5_8.x86_64.rpm
> | e4f6f354d8a38ffb4f17af0be3736be3a9e055ba3e6ddff5f21a547fb8924d4f
> |  samba-swat-3.0.33-3.39.el5_8.x86_64.rpm
> | 
> | Source:
> | 4e4b6d761aed021020fe8ac82340ba78f835fc4610516ee8564da347ac735e22
> |  samba-3.0.33-3.39.el5_8.src.rpm

Yes, they are vulnerable ... and they were also updated:

http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2012-April/018561.html




-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 262 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20120424/45351efb/attachment.sig>