[CentOS] transition to ip6
Peter Eckel
lists at eckel-edv.deMon Apr 2 10:28:40 UTC 2012
- Previous message: [CentOS] transition to ip6
- Next message: [CentOS] transition to ip6
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi Adam, > Typically the routing table does a lot of work. Much like 127.0.0.0/8 > the mask of a link-local will make it unprefered by 'public' traffic. > There is also a syntax for specifying the outbound interface for > traffic. Routing tables won't do much for you when you have several different IP addresses (stateless autocnfigured, privacy extension and static) within the same network on the same physical interface - they'll all use the same route. The longest match algorithm would more or less lead to a random choice of source addresses. If you want a specific source address to be used, you have to specify it ... no big deal, though. bind() hasn't changed that much. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iEYEARECAAYFAk95f18ACgkQ+8TW1Xhd1gdMEgCeLlhgwWa5v29cCJGuVS0IN1C+ 5UAAoPQv4sw9HHeXe4JISW8jhsS0vtJy =6E3z -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Previous message: [CentOS] transition to ip6
- Next message: [CentOS] transition to ip6
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list