[CentOS] rhel/centos alternative to logwatch?
Joseph L. Casale
jcasale at activenetwerx.comSun Apr 8 01:37:58 UTC 2012
- Previous message: [CentOS] rhel/centos alternative to logwatch?
- Next message: [CentOS] rhel/centos alternative to logwatch?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
>I just assumed there was something newer out there. 2007 was the last >release notes for the version installed on centos. There is a newer >version out there, but that would be off of the base repo and not sure >if I want to go that route in the how-to. Dates aren't always a good judge of package quality. In the case of of this one, there really hasn't been a need to update it, as it just works. I assume some scripts have undergone changes though... >I will take a look and try to see if it will be easy to change the >postfix and dovecot. More than likely I will just tell them what it is >and 'good luck' at figuring it out..lol Only ignore what you encounter and deduce to be not important. Thats the premise on which this works, known bad _or_ unknown items are presented to you for you decide what to do. >So, thanks for the input. I will stick with logwatch and give it a go. Its really not that complicated, logwatch is pretty good at what it does. Post back with more questions if they arise... jlc
- Previous message: [CentOS] rhel/centos alternative to logwatch?
- Next message: [CentOS] rhel/centos alternative to logwatch?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list