[CentOS] gnumeric/goffice: defective RPM from rpmforge ???
Nicolas Thierry-Mieg
Nicolas.Thierry-Mieg at imag.frTue Apr 10 10:09:25 UTC 2012
- Previous message: [CentOS] gnumeric/goffice: defective RPM from rpmforge ???
- Next message: [CentOS] Apparent Bug In Gnome Games
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
ken wrote: > "yum update" output: > > ............................... > --> Running transaction check > --> Processing Dependency: libgoffice-1.so.2 for package: gnumeric > ---> Package goffice.i386 0:0.6.6-1.el5.rf set to be updated > --> Finished Dependency Resolution > 1:gnumeric-1.6.3-15.el5.2.i386 from installed has depsolving problems > --> Missing Dependency: libgoffice-1.so.2 is needed by package > 1:gnumeric-1.6.3-15.el5.2.i386 (installed) > Error: Missing Dependency: libgoffice-1.so.2 is needed by package > 1:gnumeric-1.6.3-15.el5.2.i386 (installed) > ............................... > > # rpm -qa| grep goffice > goffice-0.2.2-1.el5 > > # yum deplist gnumeric|grep goffice > dependency: libgoffice-1.so.2 > provider: goffice.i386 0.2.2-1.el5 gnumeric is not in EL5/cent5, neither is goffice. you are mixing repos and haven't configured your priorities and/or includes/excludes correctly. This is not a repoforge issue. too bad whatever 3rd party repo you're using for goffice and gnumeric is either too ignorant or too bloody arrogant to use repotags, as the problem would have been obvious if they did...
- Previous message: [CentOS] gnumeric/goffice: defective RPM from rpmforge ???
- Next message: [CentOS] Apparent Bug In Gnome Games
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list