[CentOS] XEN or KVM - performance/stability/security?
Dennis Jacobfeuerborn
dennisml at conversis.deTue Apr 24 03:43:17 UTC 2012
- Previous message: [CentOS] XEN or KVM - performance/stability/security?
- Next message: [CentOS] XEN or KVM - performance/stability/security?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 04/24/2012 03:08 AM, John R Pierce wrote: > On 04/23/12 5:12 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote: >> The PVM/HVM distinction isn't really that relevant any more on modern >> hardware and modern hypervisors since most of the overhead is eliminated >> with hardware features (Nested Page Tables, etc.) and special guest drivers. > > "special guest drivers" is pretty much what paravirtualization is about. Exactly, but only since CPU got hardware extensions for virtualization. Before that the CPU could also be paravirtualized and that made a significant difference in performance. With that advantage gone though the old distinction between a "PVM guest" and "HVM guest" doesn't really matter that much any more (virt-manager asks you which of the two you want to install for example). Now you only have a "guest" that may or may not run certain paravirtualized drivers. Regards, Dennis
- Previous message: [CentOS] XEN or KVM - performance/stability/security?
- Next message: [CentOS] XEN or KVM - performance/stability/security?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list