thank you. very usefull i think i'll try btrfs or jfs, i'll send you btrfs result for you. On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 6:58 PM, Nux! <nux at li.nux.ro> wrote: > On 04.08.2012 15:19, ashkab rahmani wrote: > > thank you i have redundancy but i have simplified scenario. > > but i think ext4 is notbas fast as others. is it true? > > > > ——— > > Ashkan R > > On Aug 4, 2012 6:39 PM, "Nux!" <nux at li.nux.ro> wrote: > > > >> On 04.08.2012 15:01, ashkab rahmani wrote: > >> > hello > >> > i have 16tb storage. 8x2tb sata raided. > >> > i want to share it on network via nfs. > >> > which file system is better for it? > >> > thank you > >> > ——— > >> > Ashkan R > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > CentOS mailing list > >> > CentOS at centos.org > >> > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > >> > >> No redundancy? That's a lot of data to lose. :-) > >> > >> As for your question, I'd use ext4. It has caught up a lot with XFS > >> and > >> it's THE file system supported by RHEL and Fedora. > >> > >> -- > >> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! > >> > >> Nux! > >> www.nux.ro > >> _______________________________________________ > >> CentOS mailing list > >> CentOS at centos.org > >> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > >> > > _______________________________________________ > > CentOS mailing list > > CentOS at centos.org > > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > > Well, I think ext4 is pretty fast. Maybe XFS has a slight edge over it > in some scenarios. > ZFS on linux is still highly experimental and has received close to no > testing. > If you are in mood for experiments EL6.3 includes BTRFS as technology > preview for 64bit machines. Give it a try and let us know how it goes. > > -- > Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! > > Nux! > www.nux.ro > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >