On 2012-08-04, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote: > > As Nux! initially said, ext4 is the OS that RHEL and Fedora support as > their main file system. I would (and do) use that. The 6.3 kernel does > support xfs and CentOS has the jfs tools in our extras directory, but I > like tried and true over experimental. Isn't XFS on linux tried and true by now? It's always worked great for me. Does ext4 resolve the issue of slow fsck? Recently I had a ~500GB ext3 filesystem that hadn't been checked in a while; it took over 20 minutes to fsck. Meanwhile, a few months ago I had a problematic ~10TB XFS filesystem, and it took about 1-2 hours to fsck (IIRC 1.5 hrs). This was also a reason I switched away from reiserfs (this was well before Hans Reiser's personal problems)--a reiserfsck of a relatively modest filesystem took much longer than even an ext3 fsck. If I get some time I will try it on some spare filesystems, but I'm curious what other people's experiences are. I've looked into ZFS on linux, but it still seems not quite ready for real production use. I'd love to test it on a less crucial server when I get the chance. Their FAQ claims RHEL 6.0 support: http://zfsonlinux.org/faq.html --keith -- kkeller at wombat.san-francisco.ca.us