[CentOS] tigervnc-server-module crashes after EL 6.3 update

Cal Webster cwebster at ec.rr.com
Thu Aug 23 16:01:04 UTC 2012


On Fri, 2012-08-17 at 19:46 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 08/17/2012 01:40 PM, Cal Webster wrote:
> > On Thu, 2012-08-16 at 17:01 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> >> On 08/16/2012 11:43 AM, Cal Webster wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 2012-08-15 at 13:56 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> >>>> On 08/15/2012 09:47 AM, Cal Webster wrote:
> >>>>> On Tue, 2012-08-14 at 20:55 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> >>>>>> On 08/14/2012 05:23 PM, Cal Webster wrote:
> >>>>>>> We began experiencing failed vnc connections to the console display on
> >>>>>>> servers that have been updated to EL 6.3. No such failures have occurred
> >>>>>>> on similar connections to EL 6.2 servers.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On the client machine a normal vncviewer display appears with the
> >>>>>>> expected graphical login until the mouse pointer is moved within the
> >>>>>>> boundaries of the vncviewer window. At this point the window closes and
> >>>>>>> an error message appears in both a pop-up window and in the terminal
> >>>>>>> window in which the session was initiated stating "read: Connection
> >>>>>>> reset by peer (104)".
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On the server end, a core dump is generated and a abrt bug report is
> >>>>>>> created.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> /var/log/messages
> >>>>>>> ----------------------------------------------
> >>>>>>> Aug 14 11:00:30 jato2 abrt[11411]: File '/usr/bin/Xorg' seems to be
> >>>>>>> deleted
> >>>>>>> Aug 14 11:00:30 jato2 abrt[11411]: Saved core dump of pid 7892
> >>>>>>> (/usr/bin/Xorg) to /var/spool/abrt/ccpp-2012-08-14-11:00:30-7892
> >>>>>>> (42041344 bytes)
> >>>>>>> Aug 14 11:00:30 jato2 abrtd: Directory 'ccpp-2012-08-14-11:00:30-7892'
> >>>>>>> creation detected
> >>>>>>> ----------------------------------------------
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> This bug has been reported in the CentOS bug tracker here:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> 0005824: tigervnc-server-module keep crashing
> >>>>>>> http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=5824
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> However, this appears to be a bug upstream. The source RPM provided with
> >>>>>>> CentOS is identical to that of upstream with no modifications. Also,
> >>>>>>> there is an upstream bug reported that appears to have the same
> >>>>>>> symptoms. I have added a comment to the upstream bug report (listed
> >>>>>>> below) if anyone wishes to see the details.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> tigervnc-server-module crashes with dual screen setup
> >>>>>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820443
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> We have verified that rebuilding the unmodified source RPM for tigervnc
> >>>>>>> produces a tigervnc-server-module RPM that does not suffer from this
> >>>>>>> bug.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Removing the original tigervnc-server-module package and replacing it
> >>>>>>> with the rebuilt one fixes the problem.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I've duplicated the problem on 2 EL 6.3 x86_64 single-head display
> >>>>>>> machines and have verified the fix.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Tomorrow, I'll duplicate the problem on a dual-head x86_64 machine that
> >>>>>>> currently still works after updating to EL 6.2 then confirm the the fix.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>> Did you rebuild the SRPM using mock or directly on a physical machine
> >>>>>> with rpmbuild?
> >>>>> No mock, just a simple "rpmbuild -ba SPEC/tigervnc.spec"
> >>>> OK, if you find that this solves your problems for sure, I will build
> >>>> the SRPM outside of mock and see if it is different.
> >>> I've confirmed the same faulty behavior for the update to 6.3 on our
> >>> dual-head systems.
> >>>
> >>> Also confirmed is that replacing the 6.3 base tigervnc-server-module rpm
> >>> with the rebuilt one does fix the problem on the dual-head systems.
> >>>
> >>> One disturbing difference between single and dual headed systems is that
> >>> on the dual-head systems Xorg generates a core dump and completely
> >>> freezes up when the mouse movement is detected. Single-head systems just
> >>> fail to connect. This complication could be somehow caused by our
> >>> proprietary "ATI FirePro 2270" drivers, though. Once the rebuilt module
> >>> is installed the systems run fine.
> >>>
> >>> I've also updated the upstream bug report.
> >> can you see if either or both of these work for you:
> >>
> >> http://people.centos.org/hughesjr/tigervnc/
> >>
> >> One set was built inside of mock, the other outside of mock in a virtual
> >> machine with only the build requirements of the SRPM installed.
> > Both builds work without problems on single and dual-head systems here.
> > As with all the other tests, I only replaced the tigervnc-server-module
> > package on each host.
> >
> > I've also confirmed that i686 platforms suffer from the same bug. These
> > too, however, are easily remedied by replacing the base
> > tigervnc-server-module RPM with a locally re-build one.
> 
> Would you also test that these work:
> 
> http://people.centos.org/hughesjr/tigervnc/
> 
> (same link, newer files :D)
> 
> NOTE:  It is CentOS policy that we do not correct upstream bugs in our
> distributions directly ... therefore these will not be released into the
> main distro until upstream releases an update.  I know that is a PITA
> for people, however, it is our policy and we can't break it.

Sorry Johnny. I've been deep in some internal issues past few days -
Migration planning for Win7, building out new CentOS 6 servers, and
such. 

I'll be happy to test these.

./Cal




More information about the CentOS mailing list