On 08/20/2012 07:25 AM, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: > Hello Johnny, > > A few more questions because it's not always sure if your reply only > relates to one package or those above as well... > > On Mon, 2012-08-20 at 05:53 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>>>> kdebindings-4.3.4-5.el6 >>> No mention in any TN, no mention that it has been removed either though. > I think you overlooked this one. I'm quite sure the comment below does > not apply to kdebindings ;) . Added to my list. > >>>>> libehca-1.2.2-3.el6 > And this, or is this S390 too? Still researching. > >>>>> libica-2.1.0-2.el6 >> s390 only, not supported >>>>> librtas-1.3.4-2.el6 > PPC only too? Still Researching > >>>>> libservicelog-1.1.9-6.el6 >> ppc only, not supported >>>>> lsvpd-1.6.10-5.el6 >> ppc only, not supported > What about libvpd? You build and distribute that. If it is built, then it does not have an EXCLUSIVEARCH set in the SRPM ... however, here is lsvpd, which does: http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0795.html libvpd should also be ppc only ... but they left out the EXCLUSIVE ARCH in their SRPMS: http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2011-0548.html So, libvpd should be (and will be) removed. (see what we have to go through for the 6.x releases) >>>>> zaf-0-0.3.20080714svn.1.el6 >>> No mention in any TN, no mention that it has been removed either though. > And what about this one? Added to my list. > Regards, > Leonard. > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 262 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20120820/3b492265/attachment-0004.sig>