[CentOS] CentOS 6 vs. other RHEL clones: security advisory comparison

Mon Aug 20 16:37:22 UTC 2012
Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org>

On 08/20/2012 07:02 AM, Janne Snabb wrote:
> Hello,
> I made some statistics and comparisons about security advisories
> published by three popular RHEL 6 clones: CentOS 6, Oracle Linux 6 and
> Scientific Linux 6.
> The article is available at the following URL:
> http://bitrate.epipe.com/rhel-vs-centos-scientific-oracle-linux-6_187
> I hope you find it interesting. Looks like CentOS has been doing quite
> well this year in this regard.
> Feedback is welcome, but please post it at the bottom of the article or
> to myself in private. Do *not* send it to this mailing list unless your
> message is specifically about CentOS. Please do not start a flame war on
> this mailing list.
> In case the graphs are not visible in your browser, you should start
> using a browser which supports current technologies (specifically: SVG
> graphics).

Would you keep doing this every quarter :-D

I was working on one of these ... I would like to have one to publish
every quarter.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 262 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20120820/54ec4e04/attachment-0004.sig>