On 02/10/2012 04:25 PM, Bob Hoffman wrote: > / > ================================= > Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote > > />/ Yea, I gave up on bonding, ended up just using eth1. But every tutorial > />/ I found had added eth0 and eth1 as interfaces to br0, thus sharing the > />/ bridge so to speak. > />/ All the tutorials were for debian though, all the centos ones ended up > />/ pointing each eth to a different cridge (br0 and br1) > / > What are you actually trying to accomplish? You still seem to mix bonding > and bridging willy nilly as if they are somehow related. They are not. > > Regards, > Dennis > ================================== > > Nothing at all to do with bonding. Not at all. > eth1 to br0 , eth0 to br0....that's all. > If that is possible, I see no reason for a bond at all. > I just want to make sure if an NIC fails, the other one is still working > while I am asleep and not a care in the world. Bridging doesn't do that. You need bonding for this. Regards, Dennis