On 02/26/2012 08:39 PM, Michael Lampe wrote: > Frank Cox wrote: > >> Edit the dependency list to suit. > > Maybe I was too dumb to properly explain it: > > The Intel stuff is there implicitly. And it _is_ needed. Both for > building and then running. > > But it's not registered with rpm by Intel! > > So I _can_ build, but the resulting RPM cannot be installed -- if not > forced. (No problems then as everything _is_ there.) > > The compromise I see is removing these explicit dependencies. They are > fulfilled, but not formally available. I totally lost you. Please provide specifics, what package, is it in rpm or not, details please, so we do not chase out own tails. -- Ljubomir Ljubojevic (Love is in the Air) PL Computers Serbia, Europe Google is the Mother, Google is the Father, and traceroute is your trusty Spiderman... StarOS, Mikrotik and CentOS/RHEL/Linux consultant