[CentOS] LibreOffice rpm's vs Centos testing repo

Mon Feb 27 10:16:45 UTC 2012
Markus Falb <markus.falb at fasel.at>

On 27.2.2012 10:10, wwp wrote:
> Hello Johan,
> On Mon, 27 Feb 2012 10:02:16 +0100 Johan Vermeulen <jvermeulen at cawdekempen.be> wrote:
>> Dear All,
>> I thought the advantage from using CentOS-Testing repository would be:
>> * I then have a Selinux module
>> * Automatic update with yum update. Although that's maybe not a good idea, because I'd have to leave the Testing-repo enabled.
>> I tried installing from Libreoffice.org before, but got into trouble when logging in with ssh -X and
>> then opening LibreOffice.
> Well, if the packages are available in Testing-repo, I vote for this
> solution too, even if I will check-update manually (with --enablerepo
> and libreoffice package name). Because there won't be updates too often,
> and because I'll let testing-repo disabled here by default.

You could restrict the testing repo to only libreoffice, see yum.conf(5)
or if there are dependencies needed from testing
includepkgs=libreoffice dep1 dep2 ...

Kind Regards, Markus Falb

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 307 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20120227/7bccce91/attachment-0005.sig>