At 2012-01-04 Wed 09:53 -0600，Johnny Hughes wrote： > On 01/04/2012 04:29 AM, Christopher J. Buckley wrote: > > 2012/1/4 An Yang <an.euroford at gmail.com> > > > >> Somebody in Oracle told me, they need one year to test, I'm not sure, > >> it's true or not. > >> > > That's about right. The testing isn't done by Oracle btw, it's done by the > > end vendor. > > > > > The "end vendor" submitted the information to Oracle months ago: > > http://www.redhat.com/about/news/blog/Red-Hat-Submits-Oracle-11gR2-on-Red-Hat-Enterprise-Linux-6-Certification-Test-Results-to-Oracle > Greate! "end vendor" people said, Consequently, we confidently recommend the deployment of Oracle 11gR2 in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 production environments today. > Oracle does not want to support ASMLib on any kernel other than OEL (or > UBL if you prefer): > > https://www.redhat.com/archives/rhelv6-list/2011-December/msg00032.html > > The bottom line is that Oracle IS going to try to drive people to their > version of Linux and off RHEL. > > But I know, I am just be paranoid or some other such thing. Right > Christopher? > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 490 bytes Desc: ??????????? URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20120105/d9459c91/attachment-0005.sig>