Le ven 06 jan 2012 04:21:14 CET, Bennett Haselton a écrit: > On 1/6/2012 4:11 AM, Philippe Naudin wrote: > > Le ven 06 jan 2012 02:41:02 CET, Bennett Haselton a écrit: > > > >> On 1/6/2012 2:24 AM, Philippe Naudin wrote: > >>> Apache running as "init_t" is a call for troubles. > >> Is it? OK, any idea what caused that and how to fix it? > > No, sorry. Your httpd comes from CentOS ? > Yes > > Afaik, you should not have any process running in context init_t except > > init itself. If "ps awuxZ | grep [i]nit_t" returns more than only init > > and httpd, your problem is likely to be more complicated than a broken > > configuration of apache. > > I've got a few... > > [root at g6950-21025 ~]# ps auwxZ | grep init_t > system_u:system_r:init_t root 1 0.6 0.0 10368 712 > ? Ss 04:17 0:00 init [3] > > system_u:system_r:init_t root 537 0.2 0.1 13728 1976 > ? S<s 04:17 0:00 /sbin/udevd -d > system_u:system_r:init_t root 1684 0.0 0.0 38880 456 > ? Ssl 04:18 0:00 brcm_iscsiuio > system_u:system_r:init_t root 1690 0.0 0.0 12152 476 > ? Ss 04:18 0:00 iscsid > system_u:system_r:init_t root 1691 0.0 0.4 12648 4460 > ? S<Ls 04:18 0:00 iscsid > system_u:system_r:init_t dbus 2081 0.0 0.1 31520 1144 > ? Ssl 04:18 0:00 dbus-daemon --system > system_u:system_r:init_t root 2215 0.0 0.1 52372 1492 > ? Ssl 04:18 0:00 automount > system_u:system_r:init_t root 2254 0.0 0.1 62656 1212 > ? Ss 04:18 0:00 /usr/sbin/sshd > system_u:system_r:init_t ntp 2273 0.0 0.4 23412 5044 > ? SLs 04:18 0:00 ntpd -u ntp:ntp -p /var > /run/ntpd.pid -g > system_u:system_r:init_t root 2287 0.1 1.0 253312 10580 > ? Ss 04:18 0:00 /usr/sbin/httpd > system_u:system_r:init_t apache 2315 0.3 1.3 259488 13376 > ? S 04:18 0:00 /usr/sbin/httpd > system_u:system_r:init_t apache 2316 0.0 1.0 257436 11124 > ? S 04:18 0:00 /usr/sbin/httpd > system_u:system_r:init_t apache 2317 0.1 1.1 257436 11288 > ? S 04:18 0:00 /usr/sbin/httpd > system_u:system_r:init_t apache 2318 0.1 1.1 257436 11292 > ? S 04:18 0:00 /usr/sbin/httpd > system_u:system_r:init_t apache 2319 0.0 1.0 256720 10504 > ? S 04:18 0:00 /usr/sbin/httpd > system_u:system_r:init_t apache 2320 0.1 1.0 257436 10752 > ? S 04:18 0:00 /usr/sbin/httpd > system_u:system_r:init_t apache 2321 0.0 1.1 257436 11272 > ? S 04:18 0:00 /usr/sbin/httpd > system_u:system_r:init_t apache 2322 0.1 1.1 257436 11356 > ? S 04:18 0:00 /usr/sbin/httpd > system_u:system_r:init_t root 2386 0.0 0.0 3812 492 > tty1 Ss+ 04:18 0:00 /sbin/mingetty tty1 > system_u:system_r:init_t root 2387 0.0 0.0 3812 488 > tty2 Ss+ 04:18 0:00 /sbin/mingetty tty2 > system_u:system_r:init_t root 2390 0.0 0.0 3812 488 > tty3 Ss+ 04:18 0:00 /sbin/mingetty tty3 > system_u:system_r:init_t root 2392 0.0 0.0 3812 492 > tty4 Ss+ 04:18 0:00 /sbin/mingetty tty4 > system_u:system_r:init_t root 2394 0.0 0.0 3812 488 > tty5 Ss+ 04:18 0:00 /sbin/mingetty tty5 > system_u:system_r:init_t root 2397 0.0 0.0 3812 488 > tty6 Ss+ 04:18 0:00 /sbin/mingetty tty6 > system_u:system_r:init_t apache 2405 0.1 1.0 256412 11008 > ? S 04:18 0:00 /usr/sbin/httpd > system_u:system_r:init_t root 2406 0.3 0.3 90156 3456 > ? Ss 04:18 0:00 sshd: root at pts/0 > root:system_r:initrc_t:SystemLow-SystemHigh root 2458 0.0 0.0 61176 768 > pts/0 S+ 04:18 0:00 grep init_t > > > > I also found at least one file (the audit.log file) which has file type > file_t, even though I thought the filesystem had been re-labeled > successfully because /var/www/html/robots.txt had the correct type: > > [root at g6950-21025 ~]# ls -lZ /var/www/html/robots.txt > -rw-rw-rw- root root system_u:object_r:httpd_sys_content_t > /var/www/html/robots.txt > [root at g6950-21025 ~]# ls -lZ /var/log/audit/audit.log > -rw------- root root system_u:object_r:file_t > /var/log/audit/audit.log > > > Any idea (1) what could be causing that and (2) whether it could be > related to the problem with all those init_t processes? It's easy : your init process is broken, all these daemons but init are mis-labeled, so all the files they create (such as log files) are mis-labeled. And if the next question is "how to fix it ?", the answer is easy too : "I don't have any clue..." Sorry, -- Philippe Naudin