Blah, blah, blah, Being blocked again, still appears to be based on new content vs. included content. Which makes it very annoying when I want to include context for my response. blah, blah, blah, new content................. Hi, wwp, wwp wrote: > On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 16:31:43 +0100 Ljubomir Ljubojevic <office at plnet.rs> wrote: >> On 01/11/2012 08:45 AM, wwp wrote: >> > On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 08:57:14 -0800 (PST) John Doe<jdmls at yahoo.com> >> wrote: >> >> From: wwp<subscript at free.fr> >> >> >> >>> I wonder if some mount options aren't wrong with USB pendrives, see: >> >>> /dev/sdd1 on /media/monolith type vfat >> >>> (rw,nosuid,nodev,uhelper=udisks,shortname=mixed,dmask=0077,utf8=1,flush) my suspicion is about the flush option, which I find atypical here. <snip> > ehci_hcd does manage my devices (it's not a loadable module, apparently compiled in kernel instead), see for instance: > > kernel: usb 2-2: new high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 28 <snip> This may be a dumb question, but have you done an lsusb? I'd be curious - I know that on my brand new, as of a few months ago, Dell I have two kinds of USB ports, 1.1 and 2.0. We also have some 1.1 webcams... and some 1.0. See if your pen drive's in a slower port. mark