On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 16:23, Phil Schaffner <Philip.R.Schaffner at nasa.gov> wrote: > I'd have a look at why an apparently Internet-facing server is 5 point > releases, plus a lot of subsequent errata, behind the current 5.7 > release level; and what resultant vulnerabilities might have been exploited. > Thanks. There are a lot of very specific software on that server that precludes it from being updated. I believe that 5.2 still is seeing security updates, no? In any case, a complete reinstall with either 5.2 or a latter version is pretty much out of the question for now, though I will try to see what needs to be done in that direction. In the meantime, where should I concentrate my efforts? Thanks. -- Dotan Cohen http://gibberish.co.il http://what-is-what.com