[CentOS] SELinux and access across 'similar types'
Daniel J Walsh
dwalsh at redhat.com
Tue Jan 10 19:46:04 UTC 2012
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 01/10/2012 11:20 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 8:27 AM, Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh at redhat.com>
>> On 01/10/2012 09:00 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 7:47 AM, Daniel J Walsh
>>> <dwalsh at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>> Now if only more people used RHEL we could further enhance
>>>> the products. :^)
>>> Why isn't it accepted as more of a standard?
>> I don't understand the question.
> Why is it vendor-specific to RHEL?
I was talking Money not vendor specific. The question meant as a jab
was if more people used RHEL instead of Centos, we could pay more
developers. I thought the @redhat.com would signify why I would want
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the CentOS