[CentOS] Was Re: USB install annoyances, is, OT, hosting providers
John R Pierce
pierce at hogranch.comMon Jan 9 23:14:31 UTC 2012
- Previous message: [CentOS] Was Re: USB install annoyances, is, OT, hosting providers
- Next message: [CentOS] SOCKS server other than ss5?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 01/09/12 2:39 PM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > I've argued before that blocks should be by source - actual source, the > oldest "Received-From", not from the last mailer. Those are far too easily forged, and in fact a majority of spam has forged Recieved headers, you can only trust the one YOUR mail server puts on or a chain from the latest back as far as you see trusted servers. Also, by the time you've read the header, its too late to reject the connection. -- john r pierce N 37, W 122 santa cruz ca mid-left coast
- Previous message: [CentOS] Was Re: USB install annoyances, is, OT, hosting providers
- Next message: [CentOS] SOCKS server other than ss5?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list