[CentOS] SELinux and access across 'similar types'
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.comTue Jan 10 16:20:33 UTC 2012
- Previous message: [CentOS] SELinux and access across 'similar types'
- Next message: [CentOS] SELinux and access across 'similar types'
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 8:27 AM, Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh at redhat.com> wrote: > > On 01/10/2012 09:00 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 7:47 AM, Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh at redhat.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> Now if only more people used RHEL we could further enhance the >>> products. :^) >>> >> >> Why isn't it accepted as more of a standard? >> > I don't understand the question. Why is it vendor-specific to RHEL? -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell at gmail.com
- Previous message: [CentOS] SELinux and access across 'similar types'
- Next message: [CentOS] SELinux and access across 'similar types'
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list