[CentOS] bug submission justified for distribution of obsolete java software?
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.comThu Jan 12 02:45:11 UTC 2012
- Previous message: [CentOS] bug submission justified for distribution of obsolete java software?
- Next message: [CentOS] bug submission justified for distribution of obsolete java software?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Ross Walker <rswwalker at gmail.com> wrote: > > >> But you'd be wrong on all counts. I'd argue the opposite - that you >> should only be allowed to use languages that work across CPU types and >> OS's so as to never be locked into a monopolistic single vendor. > > You mean like Oracle? No, I meant like Intel or an OS that only runs on one or a few CPU types, or a language that only runs on one OS. Aside from the constraints/control the associated vendor might impose you lock yourself out of an easy move to any new alternatives that might come along or consolidation of apps on the platform of your choice. -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell at gmail.com
- Previous message: [CentOS] bug submission justified for distribution of obsolete java software?
- Next message: [CentOS] bug submission justified for distribution of obsolete java software?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list