On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Michael Lampe <lampe at gcsc.uni-frankfurt.de> wrote: > Namely: > > * hivex > * hivex-devel > * librdmac > * librdmac-devel > * sanlock-libs > * sanlock-devel > > and maybe others. > > Is this on purpose (I don't know if upstream has removed or updated the > 32-bit rpms, but the old ones are still in C6.3/x86_64), or is it just > the usual sloppyness (I've been told here on previous occasions the > biarch is a pain in the ass to maintain, nobody cares anyway, it's not > 'plain', and no sensible man should be using it). FYI: http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=5836 Akemi