On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 04:45:47PM -0400, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > with Irix mostly, through the early/mid-nineties). Solaris 6.3 == Sun 3; > Solaris 6.4 was the next release, and was perfectly fine and solid. There was no Solaris 6.3 or 6.4. "Sun 3" was a hardware platform (pre Sparc)! The SysV variants went Solaris 2, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 2.4, 2.5, 2.5.1, 2.6, 7, 8, 9, 10,... splat FWIW, the "Solaris" name started as a marketing thing as being the OS plus window manager, or "Operating Environment". SunOS 4 finally got rebranded as Solaris 1.x; I still have "Solaris 1.1.1" which (from the box) "contains both SunOS 4.1.3_U1 and OpenWindows Version 3_U1". Solaris 2 was the SysV variant and has SunOS 5.x OS plus so, for example, Solaris 2.4 had a 5.4 OS and kernel, plus other stuff (eg openwindows, deskset etc etc). You can still see it in "uname" output, today. Solaris 2.4 was mostly stable (I hit a few mbuf issues on Netra 5's). Solaris 2.5.1 ran pretty well (I used it on Ultra 1 and Ultra 1+ machines, then Ultra 2's). Solaris 2.6 worked well. Solaris 7 was a disaster. Solaris 8 was very stable. Solaris 9 I kinda skipped. Solaris 10 was too little, too late. (In my basement I have Solaris 1.1.1, 2.4, 2.5, 2.5.1, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10; all but 2.5.1 are original in-box distributions) -- rgds Stephen