On 7/20/2012 11:15 AM, Hakan Koseoglu wrote: > On 20 July 2012 15:19, Chris <xchris89x at googlemail.com> wrote: >> http://linux.oracle.com/switch/centos/ > I found the "update delay" graph laughable. They're comparing > themselves to a bunch of volunteers and then say "we beat people work > for free and for the love of it".... Right... IMHO, I'd rather go for > RHEL if I'm paying. (Unfortunately I don't make that decision, > customers do, disclaimer, $dayjob has OEL customers too). > Yes, pick the one bad time for CentOS and release 6 and show that in a graph. I find it interesting the CentOS is showing as faster than Oracle now. Meanwhile, if this is linux.oracle.com, shouldn't Oracle database be included in the 'free version'? If you want something laughable. Anyway, Oracle came with some old distro or book I picked up. It was free with some strings as I remember, but that is likely a decade ago now. Still, shouldn't Oracle linux include Oracle? The word Oracle being synonymous with one thing. I might have to do an install if it did and if it was free for any use. ;) -- John Hinton 877-777-1407 ext 502 http://www.ew3d.com Comprehensive Online Solutions