Warren Young wrote: > On 6/22/2012 8:40 AM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> >> wvHtml works, >> but I don't like the output - it insists on <div>, and on &rhquo instead >> of plain, simple ". > > You mean ”? > Yup. > What's wrong with that? You wanted HTML, and *any* browser will > understand that HTML entity, even Lynx. Hate it. I think it's completely unnecessary. I've done web pages, including professional and corporate ones, and never needed it. I use special characters only when there's no other option. > > If you wanted "HTML I can read like an e-book", I'd say you should be > converting to Markdown instead. One path from Word to Markdown would be > unrtf (https://www.gnu.org/software/unrtf/) to HTML, then HTML to > Markdown via Pandoc (http://johnmacfarlane.net/pandoc/). How 'bout html I can read like wordperfect <alt-f3>? mark