[CentOS] partitions vs. LVs [was: Re: How to upgrade from 5.8 to 6.2]
Nikolaos Milas
nmilas at noa.grSun Jun 24 18:56:43 UTC 2012
- Previous message: [CentOS] partitions vs. LVs [was: Re: How to upgrade from 5.8 to 6.2]
- Next message: [CentOS] partitions vs. LVs [was: Re: How to upgrade from 5.8 to 6.2]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 24/6/2012 7:47 μμ, Keith Roberts wrote: > And what happens then in that situation - do you loose any > more data than you would loose with 'standard' primary and > extended logical partitions, or does using LVM help in > recovering more data from a bad disk? Read: http://serverfault.com/questions/279571/lvm-dangers-and-caveats In a few words, if your hardware is high-quality, i.e. reliable enough so you don't expect problems, LVM adds important functionality and flexibility on servers. In any case, the need for good backups should not be overlooked. For example, mondorescue allows both full and incremental backups, using LVM or not. Nick
- Previous message: [CentOS] partitions vs. LVs [was: Re: How to upgrade from 5.8 to 6.2]
- Next message: [CentOS] partitions vs. LVs [was: Re: How to upgrade from 5.8 to 6.2]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list