[CentOS] Question about storage for virtualisation
Paul Heinlein
heinlein at madboa.comFri Jun 29 18:36:29 UTC 2012
- Previous message: [CentOS] Question about storage for virtualisation
- Next message: [CentOS] Question about storage for virtualisation
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, 29 Jun 2012, Nate Duehr wrote: > > On Jun 26, 2012, at 10:29 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote: >> >> I don't believe there's any more or less need to do so. I would >> strongly recommend that you not segregate / and /usr. Fedora and future >> versions of RHEL/CentOS will expect a unified / and /usr. > > > I may be behind, but this is the first I've heard of this... > > Any good references as to WHY?! they want to break this decades old > convention? Solaris broke it years ago. It'll certainly help builds and packaging, since no one needs to specify where, e.g., ls or rm is located. And granted that my experience is far from universal, I haven't seen a production Linux box that remote-mounts /usr in a decade. -- Paul Heinlein heinlein at madboa.com 45°38' N, 122°6' W
- Previous message: [CentOS] Question about storage for virtualisation
- Next message: [CentOS] Question about storage for virtualisation
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list