[CentOS] LibreOffice rpm's vs Centos testing repo
office at plnet.rs
Mon Mar 5 10:27:41 UTC 2012
On 02/28/2012 09:42 PM, James B. Byrne wrote:
> On Mon, February 27, 2012 12:10, nux at li.nux.ro wrote:
>> Ljubomir Ljubojevic writes:
>>> Those packages do not need to stay in testing repo. All
>>> that is
>>> necessary is for several people use packages from
>>> testing repo and
>>> report that they are working without issues to the
>>> Centos-devel mailing
>>> list in this thread:
>>> and packages will be moved to Extras repo.
>> Several people have tested this successfully. You can even
>> get slightly
>> newer packages from here:
>> http://li.nux.ro/download/nux/libreoffice/el6/x86_64/ that
>> Karanbir hasn't
>> yet got around to putting in testing (there's a *-release
>> rpm there, too).
>> I would advise against using libeoffice.org supplied RPMs
>> at this stage as
>> RHEL are also getting ready to release LO 3.4.5 in EL6
>> that will (hopefully)
>> gracefully upgrade my packages.
> For what it is worth, I am running LibreOffice 3.5.0
> installed from rpms provided by the document foundation
> and having no troubles with write or calc. I do not really
> use the other parts so on those I cannot comment.
> In fact, the experience is far better than I had with
> OpenOffice-3.3, which was so bad I went back to the 3.2
> version provided with CentOS.
I have been having OpenOffice 3.2 for EL 5.x in my repo since it's
release, by unpacking it in my repo folder, but I think desktop
integration needed some work.
It is much easier to install on several systems from repository. And I
created virtual packages to install localized environment that pulls all
packages I wanted. And update is much simpler from repository, that is
why I am trying to force people to use it that way so we can move it to
(Love is in the Air)
Google is the Mother, Google is the Father, and traceroute is your
StarOS, Mikrotik and CentOS/RHEL/Linux consultant
More information about the CentOS