[CentOS] xfs, inode64, and NFS
Warren Young
warren at etr-usa.comWed Mar 7 19:27:43 UTC 2012
- Previous message: [CentOS] xfs, inode64, and NFS
- Next message: [CentOS] xfs, inode64, and NFS
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 3/7/2012 11:16 AM, John R Pierce wrote: > On 03/07/12 6:47 AM, Ross Walker wrote: >> These days XFS should always be inode64 enabled, given the size of disks, and NFS should have been fixed a long, long time ago. > > yes. problem is, we have clients that are running all sorts of OS's, > including older versions of Solaris... this is a manufacturing > environment, so many of the clients are actually test equipment and > machine controllers and such, you can't just slap a new OS on those. Why do those embedded systems have to see a whole 74 TB storage midden? Why not slice off a 1 TB or so LVM slice for them?
- Previous message: [CentOS] xfs, inode64, and NFS
- Next message: [CentOS] xfs, inode64, and NFS
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list