[CentOS] nfslock
Johnny Hughes
johnny at centos.orgTue Mar 27 09:33:01 UTC 2012
- Previous message: [CentOS] nfslock
- Next message: [CentOS] nfslock
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 03/27/2012 04:22 AM, Lars Hecking wrote: >> wireless sure needs it to work decently, without it, its a kludge of a >> kludge. > > Sure, it's an excellent choice for mobile devices. > > But making it the default on an *Enterprise* distribution makes little > sense. > > (Just checking, this is still the CentOS mailing list, not Ubuntu? Yes.) > Remember the they here is NOT CentOS ... if I had my choice then Network Manager would not install by default on my server at all. However, it is Wireless and not Mobile that really need Network Manager. And there are MANY non-Mobile wireless devices now that are being installed "in the Enterprise". (Workstations, phone systems, building security systems, PKI card readers for access, etc.). So, really, it is mostly servers where you know you have a hard wired connection now. I don't think that Network Manager should be used outside of gnome (or KDE) personally, but upstream makes those kind of decisions ... we just clone the experience as closely as possible. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 262 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20120327/7b51e574/attachment-0001.sig>
- Previous message: [CentOS] nfslock
- Next message: [CentOS] nfslock
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list