On 21 May 2012 11:34, <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: > Earl Ramirez wrote: > > On 21 May 2012 10:06, <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: > >> Earl Ramirez wrote: > <snip> > >> > A few weeks ago I was trying to install KVM on my laptop, I bought a > >> > new laptop and immediately after I install the nVidia drivers I > receive > >> > the following error "libfcoe_device_notification: NETDEV_UNREGISTER > lo" > >> > > >> > I spent several hours googling the error and there are several issues, > >> > however none of them are related to my situation. > >> > > >> > I am running CentOS 6.2 > >> <snip> > >> You say that you deleted xorg.conf, and could then boot into runlevel 5 > >> using the default drivers. If you do an lsmod, does it show nouveau? > >> > >> When I do lsmod I see nvidia > <snip> > >> Second question: does the version of kmod-nvidia support your graphics > >> card? > > > > This is interesting now that you mention it, the sticker on the laptops > > says "nvidia GEFORCE GT 635M 2GB" and when I run lspci I see the > > following. > > 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation GF106 [GeForce GT > > 555M] (rev a1). > > > > I verified that nvidia 635M is supported on the nvidia site. > > Version:295.53 CertifiedRelease Date:2012.05.16Operating System:Linux > <snip> > > > >> Oh, and did you yum install it, so that you got nvidia-x11-drv? > >> > >> I installed it using yum. > > But what I was asking was whether this version of kmod-nvidia uses the > nvidia-released support for that card. You said you bought a new laptop > that this is on - is that brand new out of the box, or new-to-you, used? > Yes the version of kmod-nvidia supports it and it's new out of the box > > > > The correct version is x86_64 > > [wildfire at wildfire ~]$ rpm -qa | grep nvidia > > nvidia-x11-drv-295.53-1.el6.elrepo.x86_64 > > kmod-nvidia-295.53-1.el6.elrepo.x86_64 > > [wildfire at wildfire ~]$ > > > > I don't know if this will shed any light but usually before you see the > > login screen you will see nvidia once it have been installed correctly, > > however I am see intel which is strange. > > *That* is extremely strange. Could there be a second, Intel, video? > Don't see any thing that indicates that there is a second intel video only thing that is intel is the processor and the chipset This the the laptop that was bought http://www.xoticpc.com/asus-n55slds71-preorder-p-3556.html > > mark > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > -- Kind Regards Earl Ramirez