On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 12:51 AM, Frank Cox <theatre at melvilletheatre.com> wrote: <snip> >> it DOES NOT, learn to read outputs - it speaks about the elfutils >> why should their output reflect the current kernel point version >> it is not their job because "uname" exists <snip> A mail is missing i guess ? > > [frankcox at mutt ~]$ rpm -q elfutils > elfutils-0.152-1.el6.x86_64 > > That's not version 2.6.18 either. > > My question is, where does that 2.6.18 come from? > > It's not the current kernel version, it's not the gcc version, and it's not the > current elfutils version either. > > -- > MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D Digital Cinema ~ www.melvilletheatre.com > www.creekfm.com - FIFTY THOUSAND WATTS of POW WOW POWER! > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- -aft