[CentOS] Simple routing question

[James B. Byrne]

On 09/04/12 12:18 PM, James B. Byrne wrote:
> There are presently two subnets on the lan, 192.168.209.0 and
> 192.168.209.0.  I believe that the present netmask is correct in these
> circumstances.

um, those are both the same?   I assume you meant one of them to be
different?


You are correct. I mistyped.

I have host A with eth0[aaa.bbb.ccc.A] and eth1[192.168.216.A]

I have host B with eth0[aaa.bbb.ccc.B] and eth1[192.168.209.B]

and I have host C as the gateway with eth0 being the WAN and eth1
being the LAN.  Eth1 on C has the address [aaa.bbb.ccc.1] assigned to
it and has the alias [192.168.0.1] as well.

I want traffic from 192.168.216.A addressed to 192.168.209.B to go to
eth1 on B.  Instead it goes to Eth0 on C where it dies as one would
expect.

I am not terribly familiar with routing so I expect that I am doing
something wrong that is obvious yet invisible to me.  This is an
experimental set up so that I can explore these issues before
inflicting them on my unsuspecting users.

-- 
***          E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel          ***
James B. Byrne                mailto:ByrneJB at Harte-Lyne.ca
Harte & Lyne Limited          http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive              vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario             fax: +1 905 561 0757
Canada  L8E 3C3