[CentOS] Is glusterfs ready?
John Doe
jdmls at yahoo.comWed Sep 5 16:00:09 UTC 2012
- Previous message: [CentOS] Is glusterfs ready?
- Next message: [CentOS] Is glusterfs ready?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
From: Dennis Jacobfeuerborn <dennisml at conversis.de> >On 09/05/2012 07:14 AM, Bob Hepple wrote: >> Another factor is that the available space is the physical space >> divided by 4 due to the replication across the nodes on top of the >> nodes being RAID'd themselves. >That really depends on your setup. I'm not sure what you mean by the nodes >being raided themselves. I think he meant gluster "RAID1" plus hardware RAID (10 I guess from the x2, instead of standalone disks). JD
- Previous message: [CentOS] Is glusterfs ready?
- Next message: [CentOS] Is glusterfs ready?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list