[CentOS] 11TB ext4 filesystem - filesystem alternatives?
James A. Peltier
jpeltier at sfu.caFri Sep 28 23:30:26 UTC 2012
- Previous message: [CentOS] 11TB ext4 filesystem - filesystem alternatives?
- Next message: [CentOS] 11TB ext4 filesystem - filesystem alternatives?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
----- Original Message ----- | Hello, | | One day our servers farm rebooted unexpectedly (power fail happened) | and on centos 6.3 with up2date kernel we lost few hundred files | (which | probably was opened for reading, NOT writing) on XFS. | | Unexpected power lost follow to situation when some files get a zero | size. This is not uncommon with a file system like XFS, where the file system makes EXTENSIVE use of file system caching and memory and internal semantics that will make your head spin. Fact of the matter is, that in spite of this "possibility" of loss, XFS is by far the best file system for large volumes at the moment and especially during initialization time. You *can* use EXT4 with you can speed this up if you use the -E lazy_itable_init=1 -O dir_index,extent,flex_bg,uninit_bg options. -- James A. Peltier Manager, IT Services - Research Computing Group Simon Fraser University - Burnaby Campus Phone : 778-782-6573 Fax : 778-782-3045 E-Mail : jpeltier at sfu.ca Website : http://www.sfu.ca/itservices http://blogs.sfu.ca/people/jpeltier Success is to be measured not so much by the position that one has reached in life but as by the obstacles they have overcome. - Booker T. Washington
- Previous message: [CentOS] 11TB ext4 filesystem - filesystem alternatives?
- Next message: [CentOS] 11TB ext4 filesystem - filesystem alternatives?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list