On 04/10/2013 10:15 AM, Michael Mol wrote: > On 04/10/2013 10:00 AM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> Michael Mol wrote: >>> So I have a couple patches supplied to me by upstream in relation to a >>> kernel bug[1], but I can't figure out how to patch the kernel. The >>> CentOS wiki page discusses retrieving the kernel source[2], but doesn't >>> describe how to apply patches. Instructions I've found apply to CentOS5, >>> and RH has changed their kernel packaging since then. >>> >>> I've been banging my head on this off and on for quite a while, now. >>> I've mucked with Gentoo and Debian packaging, but kernel RPMs are a new >>> one for me... >> <snip> >> Um, if you got it from upstream, meaning, I presume, that you have a >> license, why not call their support and ask them - that's what you're >> spending money for.... > > Upstream meaning kernel developers, not RH themselves. Though the kernel > developer in question happens to be an RHEL employee. > > RH employee. Doh. :) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 555 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20130410/351f95b5/attachment-0005.sig>