On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 5:19 PM, Gregory P. Ennis <PoMec at pomec.net> wrote: > > I am a new hylafax+ user and other than the ghostscript problem I am > very impressed. Hylafax+ does allow you to control the location of > ghostscript so once I get it compiled I should be able to point it to > the correct version. Instead of using the Fedora RPM, I am going to > compile it and try to route the files to a different location. I really > screwed up a different system trying to do an rpm install with a Fedora > module with a different piece of software. I am a little gun shy about > doing that again. > > I am using Hylafax+ on CentOS 5.9 to replace a vsifax system installed > on SCO. If I can get ghostscript 9.07 installed properly this will be a > very good replacement. > > If any of you have additional suggestions, I sure appreciate your help. It doesn't help with this particular problem, but is there some reason for using CentOS 5.x vs. 6.x? -- Les Mikesell at gmail.com