On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 10:56 AM, Dave Johansen <davejohansen at gmail.com> wrote: >>> >> I suggest you use VirtualBox, or some other distro. > > I'll really like CentOS/RHEL and will definitely stick with it. Virtualbox isn't 'instead of' CentOS' it is 'instead of KVM' as a virtualization layer. Not sure how much difference there is in capability, other than being available for many more platforms, including 32-bit linux. There should be some overlap in supported image formats. I've moved vmdk's created on vmware to both, but I'm not sure what others they each handle. > The > point of my questions wasn't to complain or any like that, but just > surprise because it seemed that the no 32 bit support didn't line up > with my experience and just trying to make sure I understood > everything. If you have hardware support for virtualization, you should probably be running 64-bit Centos with KVM and not much else at the host OS level. If you have applications that need 32-bit, they could run in a guest. -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell at gmail.com