[CentOS] Red Hat CEO: Go Ahead, Copy Our Software
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.comFri Aug 16 15:16:56 UTC 2013
- Previous message: [CentOS] Red Hat CEO: Go Ahead, Copy Our Software
- Next message: [CentOS] Red Hat CEO: Go Ahead, Copy Our Software
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote: > > > The bottom line ... Robert is correct, the relationship is certainly > symbiotic and not parasitic. Red Hat (the company) needs to make money, > and software that is built on the same code base is available for free > as well. It is a win-win ... which is exactly what the GPL provides for. Red Hat is clearly aware that they would never have become a popular distribution in the first place without their own freely redistributable release. My question is why they now think it is better to not provide that directly - and get the brand recognition, community input, and potential support customers using the exact code as they will as paying customers. Why push them to work-alikes with different branding where many users won't even understand the relationship, with the obvious danger that another brand may compete for paid support? -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell at gmail.com
- Previous message: [CentOS] Red Hat CEO: Go Ahead, Copy Our Software
- Next message: [CentOS] Red Hat CEO: Go Ahead, Copy Our Software
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list