Kai Schaetzl wrote: > M.roth at 5-cent.us wrote on Thu, 5 Dec 2013 14:37:29 -0500: > >> And here's two thoughts that just struck me: first, they have no way to >> apply to be whitelisted. > > I think there are ways, they do maintain a whitelist. Maybe Hostmonster is > just not good enough to get on it. Did you consider that? > >> And second, NIXSpam is a free service, right? Um, as someone said >> recently, you get what you pay for. > > If you pay you want to get whitelisted? Did you really want to say that? > Huh? No, the CentOS list is choosing to use NIXSpam. The list doesn't pay for it. On the other hand, NIXSpam offers no way to apply to be whitelisted by them, pay or not. mark