Am 21.02.2013 00:31, schrieb skull: > Am 17.02.2013 14:23, schrieb Tilman Schmidt: >> The aim of my question was to hear how others are dealing with >> that situation. Is there someone who has successfully applied the >> Debian patch, deployed Kritian Lyng's 3.0 version of NRPE, or >> used Icinga's check_nrpe with Nagios on CentOS? Are there other >> approaches? Which one appears the most sensible? Or is there just >> nobody using Nagios on CentOS in an IPv6 enabled network? > I would just switch to icinga. > You can use ALL your configs and scripts you made for nagios so the > "migration" isn't really a problem. O-kay ... So how exactly do I do that? Where do I find Icinga for CentOS? Nagios is available in EPEL. Icinga isn't. > [ts at bombur ~]$ yum search icinga > Loaded plugins: downloadonly, fastestmirror > Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile > epel/metalink | 16 kB 00:00 > * base: mirror.netcologne.de > * epel: mirror.fraunhofer.de > * extras: mirror.netcologne.de > * updates: mirror.netcologne.de > base | 3.7 kB 00:00 > epel | 4.3 kB 00:00 > epel/primary_db | 5.0 MB 00:11 > epel-bacula | 2.9 kB 00:00 > epel-bacula/primary_db | 11 kB 00:00 > epel-bacula-source | 2.9 kB 00:00 > epel-bacula-source/primary_db | 2.7 kB 00:00 > extras | 3.5 kB 00:00 > updates | 3.5 kB 00:00 > updates/primary_db | 5.1 MB 00:09 > epel/pkgtags | 327 B 00:00 > Warning: No matches found for: icinga > No Matches found > [ts at bombur ~]$ -- Tilman Schmidt Phoenix Software GmbH Bonn, Germany -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 260 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20130223/70013fc8/attachment-0005.sig>