[CentOS] Fixed - Re: More on amavis/clam permission errors on Centos 6.3

Nicolas Thierry-Mieg Nicolas.Thierry-Mieg at imag.fr
Thu Jan 31 14:26:38 UTC 2013

Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>> As you have seen there are differences between the packages. This makes
>> the CentOS documentation worthless to you as you are not using the same
>> versions used in the documentation.
> I had hopes that the 'official' packaging would work well, particularly
> now that both are on the same release.  I really wanted to do this all
> 'official' packages.  I know there is nothing wrong with rpmforge, I use
> it for a number of things, just this time around for mail, I was
> shooting for 'fully supported cruft'.  Shows how good that approach takes!

I'm not sure what made you think so, but epel is no more "official" than 
rpmforge. It's just another third party repo.
The only "official" repos are base and updates. Perhaps CR could qualify 
as semi-official... and that's it, I'ld say.

glad Ned could help you solve your problem.

More information about the CentOS mailing list