[CentOS] Why is localhost self-signed cert a CA cert?
Craig White
craig.white at ttiltd.comTue Jan 8 23:31:14 UTC 2013
- Previous message: [CentOS] Why is localhost self-signed cert a CA cert?
- Next message: [CentOS] Why is localhost self-signed cert a CA cert?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Jan 8, 2013, at 4:27 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > On 01/08/2013 05:07 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: >> On 01/08/2013 11:49 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >>> Why was this chosen? Why is not -extensions v3_req used in the >>> certificate creation? >> Because it has to be able to sign itself? > > I just checked a couple RFCs. If this is a root CA cert, of course it is > self-signed. By definition. > > But a self-signed server cert is not a CA root cert.... ---- it is a CA root certificate if I say it is. Craig
- Previous message: [CentOS] Why is localhost self-signed cert a CA cert?
- Next message: [CentOS] Why is localhost self-signed cert a CA cert?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list