On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Mark LaPierre <marklapier at aol.com> wrote: > On 12/31/2012 07:27 PM, Rob Townley wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 9:10 AM, Craig White<craig.white at ttiltd.com> > wrote: > > > >> > >> ---- > >> I guess I'm not sure what the point is by having files owned by 'nobody' > >> and then adding nobody 'user' to the 'users' group - that seems to be > some > >> rather twisted logic that has security implications far beyond the > simple > >> samba share configuration but hey… it's your box. > >> > >> chirp users /data/public -R > >> chmod g+s /data/public -R > >> > >> will ensure that all files/folders in /data/public are owned by the > group > >> 'users' and any new files/folders created within (whether by samba or > not) > >> belong to that group. > >> > >> if you add 'inherit permissions = yes' to the 'share' definition in > >> smb.conf, that also will impact. > >> Yes, you could also add: > >> force security mode = 770 #or 775 > >> force directory security mode = 770 #or 775 > >> within the share definition too. > >> > > > > > > What is the chirp command and where is it found? > > "yum search all chirp" yielded nothing. > > I believe you will find that chirp was a fat finger for chgrp. > THANK YOU... i could not figure out the typo quickly. i wanted to make sure the complete and correct reference is there when i need it some time at 3am. > -- > _ > °v° > /(_)\ > ^ ^ Mark LaPierre > Registerd Linux user No #267004 > https://linuxcounter.net/ > **** > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >