[CentOS] what's wrong with dag.wieers?
Pete Geenhuizen
pete at geenhuizen.netWed Jul 3 13:10:30 UTC 2013
- Previous message: [CentOS] what's wrong with dag.wieers?
- Next message: [CentOS] what's wrong with dag.wieers?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 07/03/2013 08:34 AM, James B. Byrne wrote: > On Tue, July 2, 2013 17:34, John Hinton wrote: > > Ditto here, and for the same reasons. > > This was our experience as well; changing userids between clam and > clamav between updates caused us a lot of avoidable headaches. We > switched to epel for clamav because of that one issue. Otherwise we > have been very pleased with rpmforge. It will prove a great loss if > there is a serious possibility that this resource might fade away. > > Fading away is a distinct possibility. David Hrbac, who is trying to maintain rpmforge had this to say on that subject. "And of course, there's still a question about the Repoforge. Do we really want it? Isn't a time for Epel to replace Repoforge? I still want to keep Repoforge alive bud have no replies from Dag." Pete -- Unencumbered by the thought process. -- Click and Clack the Tappet brothers
- Previous message: [CentOS] what's wrong with dag.wieers?
- Next message: [CentOS] what's wrong with dag.wieers?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list