Am 03.07.2013 um 15:10 schrieb Pete Geenhuizen <pete at geenhuizen.net>: > On 07/03/2013 08:34 AM, James B. Byrne wrote: >> On Tue, July 2, 2013 17:34, John Hinton wrote: >> >> Ditto here, and for the same reasons. >> >> This was our experience as well; changing userids between clam and >> clamav between updates caused us a lot of avoidable headaches. We >> switched to epel for clamav because of that one issue. Otherwise we >> have been very pleased with rpmforge. It will prove a great loss if >> there is a serious possibility that this resource might fade away. >> >> > Fading away is a distinct possibility. > David Hrbac, who is trying to maintain rpmforge had this to say on that > subject. > > "And of course, there's still a question about the Repoforge. Do we > really want it? Isn't a time for Epel to replace Repoforge? I still want > to keep Repoforge alive bud have no replies from Dag." for an assessment of such statements is the context essential (Subject: Clamav) http://lists.repoforge.org/pipermail/users/2013-July/thread.html -- LF