On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com>wrote: > > On 03/08/2013 09:21 AM, Harold Pritchett wrote: > > On 3/8/2013 8:57 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > >> On 03/08/2013 08:07 AM, SilverTip257 wrote: > >>> On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 10:54 PM, Harold Pritchett <harold at uga.edu> > wrote: > >>> > >>>> On 3/7/2013 10:10 PM, Stephen Harris wrote: > >>>>> On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 09:54:59PM -0500, Harold Pritchett wrote: > >>>>>> What other information do I need which may be available? > >>>>> What does 'vgscan' say? 'vgchange -a y' ? > >>>>> > >>>> [root at mickey www]# vgscan > >>>> Reading all physical volumes. This may take a while... > >>>> Found volume group "VolGroup00" using metadata type lvm2 > >>>> > >>> Do both Volume Groups on those two sets of disks have the same name? > >>> VolGroup00 > >> This is all to common an issue. I make a point that all LVMs are > >> uniquely named. > >> > > Actually, no. The VolGroup00 name is associated with the running > system. It's the default name when you install CentOS with the default > option. The vol group on the other disks > > is "vg0" and is the name I used when I created the system several years > ago. > > I would have expected that to show as a result of the vgscan and > I would have expected the same after vgchange. > vgchange commands. Does RAID change things wrt LVM appareance to the > system? > No. > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > -- ---~~.~~--- Mike // SilverTip257 //