[CentOS] ntfsprogs update probs anyone?

Fri Mar 22 13:43:39 UTC 2013
Phil Savoie <psavoie1783 at rogers.com>

On 03/22/2013 08:15 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
> Phil Savoie wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Not sure I understand the error message:
>>
>> yum update
>> Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, refresh-packagekit, security
>> Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
>>     * base: less.cogeco.net
>>     * elrepo: elrepo.org
>>     * extras: centos.mirror.rafal.ca
>>     * rpmforge: mirror.cpsc.ucalgary.ca
>>     * updates: centos.mirror.rafal.ca
>> Setting up Update Process
>> Resolving Dependencies
>> --> Running transaction check
>> ---> Package fuse-ntfs-3g.x86_64 0:2010.10.2-1.el6.rf will be updated
>> ---> Package fuse-ntfs-3g.x86_64 0:2013.1.13-1.el6.rf will be an update
>> ---> Package ntfsprogs.x86_64 0:1.13.1-1.el6.rf will be obsoleted
>> --> Processing Dependency: ntfsprogs = 1.13.1-1.el6.rf for package:
>> gnome-vfs2-ntfs-1.13.1-1.el6.rf.x86_64
>> ---> Package ntfsprogs.x86_64 0:2013.1.13-1.el6.rf will be obsoleting
>> ---> Package rpmforge-release.x86_64 0:0.5.2-2.el6.rf will be updated
>> ---> Package rpmforge-release.x86_64 0:0.5.3-1.el6.rf will be an update
>> --> Finished Dependency Resolution
>> Error: Package: gnome-vfs2-ntfs-1.13.1-1.el6.rf.x86_64 (@rpmforge)
>>               Requires: ntfsprogs = 1.13.1-1.el6.rf
>>               Removing: ntfsprogs-1.13.1-1.el6.rf.x86_64 (@rpmforge)
>>                   ntfsprogs = 1.13.1-1.el6.rf
>>               Obsoleted By: ntfsprogs-2013.1.13-1.el6.rf.x86_64 (rpmforge)
>>                   ntfsprogs = 2013.1.13-1.el6.rf
>>     You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem
>>     You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest
>>
>> But rpm -q reports:
>>
>> rpm -q gnome-vfs2 ntfsprogs
>> gnome-vfs2-2.24.2-6.el6.x86_64
>> ntfsprogs-1.13.1-1.el6.rf.x86_64
>
> you wanted:
> rpm -q gnome-vfs2-ntfs
>
> it seems repoforge updated ntfsprogs but forgot to update
> gnome-vfs2-ntfs accordingly.
>
> You should mention it on the repoforge list and/or file a bug at
> https://github.com/repoforge/rpms/issues

Aha!  Thank you for this.  Sure beats the non-answer I received 
yesterday.  I will file right away.

Phil