On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 8:47 AM, Max Pyziur <pyz at brama.com> wrote: > On Tue, 26 Mar 2013, me at tdiehl.org wrote: > > > On Tue, 26 Mar 2013, Max Pyziur wrote: > > > >> > >> Greetings, > >> > >> The alpine mail rpm indicates that it comes packaged with configuration > >> files (/etc/pine*conf*). However, they aren't there. Possible? > >> > >> Also, how did you get rid of the annoying alpine bug: a message that > keeps > >> flashing - [Folder vulnerable - directory /var/spool/mail must have 1777 > >> protection]? > > > > There is no alpine rpm in Centos 6. Where did you get that? Suggest you > > ask for help on the correct mailing. > > I got it from @epel repositories: > Installed Packages > alpine.x86_64 > 2.03-2.el6 > @epel > Gotcha. EPEL/Fedora would be the ones to ask. Chances are you'll find someone there who uses alpine. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo There are many Fedora mailing lists -- the Users list is a good place to start. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > It seems fairly common in the Fedora/CentOS realm to rely on packages from > other key repositories. Rackspace recommends installing yum repo files for > CentOS. > As for (al)pine, it's an easier mail client (for me) than mutt. > On CentOS 5, installations of the alpine rpm included the /etc/*conf > files. > > > Regards, > > > > > > > Max Pyziur > pyz at brama.com > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > -- ---~~.~~--- Mike // SilverTip257 //