[CentOS] recover lvm from pv

On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com>wrote:

>
> On 03/08/2013 09:21 AM, Harold Pritchett wrote:
> > On 3/8/2013 8:57 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> >> On 03/08/2013 08:07 AM, SilverTip257 wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 10:54 PM, Harold Pritchett <harold at uga.edu>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On 3/7/2013 10:10 PM, Stephen Harris wrote:
> >>>>> On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 09:54:59PM -0500, Harold Pritchett wrote:
> >>>>>> What other information do I need which may be available?
> >>>>> What does 'vgscan' say?  'vgchange -a y' ?
> >>>>>
> >>>> [root at mickey www]# vgscan
> >>>>       Reading all physical volumes.  This may take a while...
> >>>>       Found volume group "VolGroup00" using metadata type lvm2
> >>>>
> >>> Do both Volume Groups on those two sets of disks have the same name?
> >>>     VolGroup00
> >> This is all to common an issue.  I make a point that all LVMs are
> >> uniquely named.
> >>
> > Actually, no.  The VolGroup00 name is associated with the running
> system.  It's the default name when you install CentOS with the default
> option.  The vol group on the other disks
> > is "vg0" and is the name I used when I created the system several years
> ago.
>
> I would have expected that to show as a result of the vgscan and
>

I would have expected the same after vgchange.


> vgchange commands.  Does RAID change things wrt LVM appareance to the
> system?
>

No.


>
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS at centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>



-- 
---~~.~~---
Mike
//  SilverTip257  //